Kind Note: For Enquires please contact via   +91 8317692733/9642837599 (No calls please) (OR) Through Email: contact@sadhanainfotech.com. We shall approach you within 24 hours.
An IS0 9001:2015 Certified Institute

Blog

Back


Date: 13 November 2019

Regulatory Affairs- Top Deficiencies observed in CTD Dossiers

Top Deficiencies observed in CTD Dossiers:

 

  1. Supportive clinical and nonclinical full text articles are not provided in the dossier (Module IV and V)

 

  1. Literature cited in Module IV and Module V is not properly summarized in Module II. Further the clinical and nonclinical summary does not match with the full text articles provided in Module IV and V.

 

  1. Photocopies and/or full reference particulars of literature used in Module IV and Module V are illegible and cannot be read properly.

 

  1. Files are poorly bound.

 

  1. Table of contents is incomplete.

 

  1. No version number and no date assigned to the dossier.

 

  1. Pagination of the submission is faulty.

 

  1. Full description of the reactions/steps used in the API synthesis is not presented. The drug substance purification is not at all provided. The Specifications of starting materials, reagents, catalysts, solvents and intermediates used in the process are not described in full.The mass balance in the exhibited reactions scheme is incorrect.

 

  1.  Though Toluene is used as solvent in the synthesis but the same has not been tested for the presence of residual benzene.

 

  1. The physical constants such as solubility in water, buffers at different pH values & organic solvents are not described.

 

  1. Existence/absence of polymorphism and chirality is not discussed.

 

  1. Hygroscopicity, particle size distribution, flowability, granularity etc. not discussed in detail.

  

  1. API specifications lack attributes additional to compendia monograph, e.g. residual solvents, particle size distribution, chirality, polymorphism, crystal structure

 

  1. COA for secondary/working standards not provided.

 

  1. COA and other QC documents are not signed dated and certified by QA.

 

  1. The forced degradation data is provided from literature. The actual studies are not provided.

 

  1. The stability indicating method has not been used for stability studies.

 

  1. Pharmaceutical development reports are incomplelete.

 

  1. Some of the Excipients actually used in the drug formulations are not included in batch formula.

 

  1. The quantity and standard for some of the Excipients not indicated in the unit and batch formula .Commercial colorant mixtures are used for tablet coating. The composition and test methods for the same are not detailed.

 

  1. Microbial limit is not included in FP specifications.

 

  1. Some of the documents such as stability studies report, method validation, and process validation are not in English.

 

  1. TSE/BSE declaration is not provided for the sensitive Excipients and drugs (e.g. Mg-stearate )

 

  1. Process validation report on first 3 commercial batches is not provided.

 

  1. Release/stability specifications are not provided.

 

  1. Real-time stability studies carried out without considering zone conditions.

 

  1. The spectral data such as IR, NMR,Elemental Analysis, X Ray Diffraction as a means for evidence of chemical structure is missing.

 

  1. Isomerism,Stereochemistry , Poly morphism studies and discussion on the API used in dosage form is lacking.

 

  1. API is sourced from two different vendors. However, Name and compelete contact details of each API-manufacturer is not provided Further, route of manufacturing, reaction scheme, brief process and impurity profiling of the product from each source is not provided.

 

  1. Methods used to assess impurities are not qualified. Potential impurities are not discussed.

 

Though inorganic toxic substances (e.g. cyanide/thiocyanate) and hazardous reagents (e.g. triethylamine/ alkyl halides) are used in the process but residual limits are not provided. Specifications of raw materials and intermediates used in the synthesis are not provided.

 

  1. TSE/BSE aspects of raw materials are totally ignored.

 

  1. Reference standards/materials are not  well characterized.

 

  1. The quality of the APIs meet only the requirements of specific monographs but does not meet to specifications described in the general monographs of a pharmacopoeia

  

  1. The specifications for your in-house product are not clear and complete. The test for identity and impurities are not described at all. The assay procedure is nonspecific. We need duly validated HPLC /GC based specific assay method.

 

  1. The unknown impurities present in the drug substance are more than ICH limits.

 

  1. The drug is known to be a polymorphic in nature but the same is not discussed in the presentation.

 

  1. Residual solvent levels are exceeding Pharmacopeia limits.

 

  1. Chirality and polymorphism is not addressed adequately.

 

  1. Justification for the use of Excipients which may carry reactive Impurities such as Hydrogen peroxide (other oxidized species), formaldehyde and Formic Acid is not provided

 

  1. Justification for use of highly hydrates form of API used in the product is not provided?

 

  1. The moisture permeation data for the proposed blister pack not provided.

 

  1. The extractable and leachable study for the proposed stoppers and plastic containers used for final packaging of the drug product is not provided.

 

  1. ICH Q3C (impurities in residual solvents) and USP are not adequately considered for controlling solvent residues in the final product.

 

  1. The specifications for container closure system are inadequate. The type of the polymer used for immediate container of the API product need to be identified and characterized as per specifications provided in General Monographs in Pharmacopeia.

 

  1. The residual metals from the synthetic process are not adequately addressed.

 

  1. The specifications for intermediates formed during the synthesis, starting materials, solvents and reagents are incomplelete and misleading

 

  1. The specific test for the control chirality of the drug substance is not provided.
  2. The proposed assay procedure is insufficient to control chiral impurities.

 

  1. The source, lot number, and purity of the impurity standards are not provided.

 

  1. The analytical report does not provide results of analysis in figures. The result in terms

“conforms” is not acceptable.

  1. The quantitative values provide in COA are below the limit of Quantitation (LOQ).

 

  1. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of Quantitation (LOQ) are not provided for HPLC and GC methods used to control impurities and residual solvents in the API.

 

  1. The HPLC method used for assay of the API and impurities is same. It has been observed form method validation data that the method is adequate for the assay of the API but not appropriate for the assay of impurities.

 

  1. A specific method of Analysis of impurities is not provided. Further the method used for the analysis of API is also nonspecific.

  

  1. CTD holder has provided his own in house method for the analysis of API and Impurities without any validation details.

 

  1. Scoring and Engraving details for your tablet preparation is nit provided.

 

  1. The complete composition of the coating materials is not provided. You have used titanium dioxide as Opacifier but the same is not mentioned in batch formula.
  2. Organic Solvent used for film coating of product is not declared any where.

 

  1. Missing Microbial Contamination results. (Total Count and pathogen Count not provided)

 

  1. The packaging details are missing in stability report.

 

  1. The preservatives used in your Injectable dosage forms is not declared on the label

 

  1. The expiry date assigned to the product is not matching with the stability data provided

 

  1. The specification of the Excipients and API does not confirm to the latest amendments done in E.P. Monograph.

 

  1. API: Spectral graphs for IR, NMR, UV Spectra studies performed are illegible and interpretation of the same is inadequate.

 

  1. The raw materials/intermediates/reagents/solvents used in the process are not properly

 

controlled for potential impurities

 

  1. The product is analyzed as per specifications provided in British Pharmacopeia.

 

However, General Specifications provided for the drug substances are totally ignored.

 

  1. The starting materials are not examined for specific Chiral/isomeric impurities which can be carried forward.

 

  1. The final product is manufactured using critical raw materials from two different suppliers. However, no special attention has been given to differences in quality of the end product.

 

  1. The final product is manufactured using two different route of synthesis. However, no attention has been given to impurity profiling of the product from each route.

 

  1. Acetone, Methanol and IPA have been used in the synthesis. However, these solvents are not analyzed for chance contamination of Class I solvents from which they are prepared.

 

  1. The Class I solvent Benzene is used in synthesis of the API products. The residual limits for the same are not checked at any point.

 

  1. The catalysts such as Palladium/Platinum are used in the synthesis of the products. The residual limits for the same are not specified.

 

  1. The most hazardous substances such Cyanides are used in the synthesis of the API Product. The same requires replacement with alternative safe reagent/reactant. Alternatively, the rout of synthesis may be modified.

 

  1. Impurity profiling is performed using qualitative TLC test. Specific validated HPLC /GLC method for qualifying the impurities are not available.

 

 

  1. The synthesis of the drug substance involves multiple stages. No discussion is provided on carryover impurities from the starting material and from the intermediates formed during the synthesis.

 

  1. The Prospective Process Validation on 3 initial batches has not been provided. The retro prospective Process Validation data submitted is inadequate to conclude that your manufacturing process is valid.

 

  1. The in-house analytical procedure provided for the product needs through validation. The tests performed in MOH laboratory indicate that the method is vague.

 

  1. The source of starting materials not disclosed.

 

  1. Bio-waver for your products of different strengths is not justified.

 

  1. Stability summary does not include conclusions with respect to storage conditions and shelf-life.

 

  1. The Excipients used for manufacturing your Tablet dosage form is Novel. You have not e provide enough data on its source, synthesis, characterization and safety.

 

  1. The process control details such as moisture (range), blend uniformity, bulk and tapped densities and particle size distribution are not provided.

 

  1. The process control details such as average weight, weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability and disintegration are not provided for your tablet dosage form.

 

84

All the starting materials/Excipients not declared. The information on some  hazardous

 

materials (solvents, reagents) is concealed.

 

  1. The route of synthesis of the starting materials involves hazardous and toxic reagents. The residual impurity of the same is not determined. The finished products are not analyzed to show absence of the residual amount of catalysts and hazardous substances used in the synthesis. The test results provided for 3 initial batches of API production are in abbreviated form. The batch size and yields are not stated clearly. The quality of solvent and water used for final purification is not described. The In-house Analytical method used is not described in detail.

 Disclaimer

 The views and opinions expressed in this article are only those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FDA.

 References

ICH, Q3A Impurities in New Drug Substances (R2) (Geneva, June 2008).

FDA, OGD, Guidance for Industry, ANDAs: Impurities in Drug Substances (R1) (Rockville, MD, June 2009).

FDA, Guidance for Industry, Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Impurities in Drug Substances and Products: Recommended Approaches, Draft (Rockville, MD, December 2008).

FDA, Residual Solvents in ANDAs: Questions and Answers (Oct. 28, 2008).

 FDA, Guidance for Industry, Residual Solvents in Drug Products Marketed in the United States (Rockville, MD, November 2009).

EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4446/2000), Feb. 21, 2008.

Theo Dekker, D.Sc., Experience with Prequalification of Dossiers (quality part), Kuala Lumpur – Malaysia 21-25 February 2005

Vicente, How to prepare new Application? 28-29/1/10, EDQM

Lynda Palesehnuik, FPP Assessment and deficiencies. WHO Workshop, Kenya 2009

Victor Garvin, EDQM inspection of API Sites, Irish Medical Board, 23.10.2008

EDQM, Top deficiencies found during first assessment of new applications from October 2007 to December 2007, PA/PH/CEP (08) 11 re

USP 34–NF 29,

US FDA 483 Citations